Skip to main content
\( \newcommand{\lt}{ < } \newcommand{\gt}{ > } \newcommand{\amp}{ & } \)

Section19.2Conjectures and Proofs

Remark19.2.1

Don't read this section until you have tried some of the exploration in the previous section!

In the last section we defined some new functions, and asked some questions about them. You can try them by hand, or use computation to explore them further.

Sage note19.2.2Syntax for sigma

Here is the syntax for doing this in Sage. This was a case where it was better to try it out by hand first, though!

What were some of your conjectures? It is quite likely that you (or others, if in a class setting) discovered some of these:

  • \(\sigma_1(p)=p+1\) if \(p\) is prime.

  • \(\sigma_0(p^e)=e+1\) if \(p^e\) is a prime power.

  • \(\sigma_i\) is in fact multiplicative for \(i=0,1\).

If you dug a little deeper, or had a little more time to spend, your conjectures may have also included ones like these:

  • \(\sigma_1(p^e)=1+p+p^2+\cdots +p^e\) for \(p^e\) a prime power.

  • \(\sigma_1(2^e)=2^{e+1}-1\).

  • \(\sigma_0(n)\) is odd precisely if \(n\) is a perfect square.

Let's prove the most important of these things, as well as mention a few other useful formulas.

Subsection19.2.1Prime powers

Again, usually one will have discovered various formulas that are special cases of the following, among others. It's surprisingly easy to find the patterns!

Subsection19.2.2Multiplicativity

It's a bit harder to prove the following.

This automatically leads to many facts, in particular to this one.

We will not prove this fact directly! It is possible, and might make a good challenge exercise. But it is not efficient.

Instead, we will prove below a theorem that exemplifies a general principle:

Otherwise we do an endless line of proofs like the ones we did for \(\phi\) (recall Fact 9.5.2), but for every arithmetic function.

Subsection19.2.3A very powerful lemma

Let \(\sum_{d\mid n}\) denote the sum over all positive divisors (including \(1\) and \(n\)) of \(n\). Then we have the following, the proof of which will be easier than for Euler's function.

Proof

In the special cases \(i=0\) and \(i=1\) of the corollary we see that \(\sigma_0=\tau\) and \(\sigma_1=\sigma\) are multiplicative. Since we will use them later, we properly define the special cases of \(n^i\) here.

Definition19.2.9

Let us set the following two arithmetic functions:

  • \(u(n)=1\) to be the unit function

  • \(N(n)=n\) to be the identity function